pictures of short hairstyles for girls

images Mohawk Hairstyles For Black

This style suits petite girls

gc_kaavaali

12-10 02:53 PM

Please consider contributing IV...IV need your help to resolve our immigration problems.

http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15905

---

wallpaper This style suits petite girls

cute hairstyles for girls with

nidar

03-05 10:44 AM

I am an IT consultant



What is the probable Approval date for this application?


My details:
EB2-labor 09/2006.
I-140 SRC078XXXXXXX(Texas)
Reciept: 02/27/2007
Notice: 07/31/2007
Priority:09/01/2006
section: Member of professional w/adv degree or of exceptional ability . Sec203(b)(2)

I-485:# SRC08-008-53-XXX(Texas:2008:eight day from 09/01/2008)
Recieved:08/14/2007
Notice :09/11/2007
Section: Adjustment as direct beneficiary of imigrant petition.

Finger Printing:12/20/2007

---

pictures short hairstyles

ashkam

04-04 02:05 PM

I filed my 485 in August and got married later and my wife is on H4 right now. I'm on H1 as of now. I'm not using my EAD right now, so that my wife can maintain her H4 status. I'm planning her F1 processing from H4, so that once she is on F1 officially, I want to use EAD to change employers.

Is there any risk involved here and if so, please let me know

Thanks in Advance

Why do you have to wait for your wife to be on F1 before changing to EAD? Even if you use your EAD now, she will still be in valid AOS status.

---

2011 cute hairstyles for girls with

New Short Hairstyles For Girls

cool_guy_onnet1

06-01 01:45 PM

Are you sure of this? I, of course, hope you are right. It would be great!
Please post this where it's VISIBLE

---

more...

short haircuts Girls. 3N16MA

boreal

08-24 06:38 PM

Quick point:

I would request members to please post their threads under the proper forum header. The issue raised by this thread has nothing to do with IV Agenda or Legislative issues.

Thanks,
BKarnik
wow .. 483 posts! Way to go!

---

Textured Short Hairstyles

admin

06-01 04:19 PM

Question for Foks asking for a separate bill : I understand from Admins answer above , this may not be possible now.

My question is , separting this from CIR will QUICKEN the proceedings with respect to our issues?

Question for Admin : Was this poll started by IV?

BTW I have voted in favor of a separate bill assuming it will quicken things. Thanks.


This poll was started by one our forum members and not by the organizing committee.

Repeating my answer, no Senator is even willing to talk to us regarding an alternate bill till the fate of CIR is sealed.

Look at the necessary steps to pass a bill. We need to convince a senator, have the bill analyzed and discussed in the Senate Judiciary Committe, discussed and amended in the Senate Floor, passed in the Senate, convince a bunch of House Reps, get it introduced in the House, discussed in the House Judiciary Committee, discussed in the House, passed in the house. Only after all these steps will it be at the current stage as CIR.

So which Senator do you think will be willing to do all of this and then find that CIR with most of the provisions has already been passed.

---

more...

emo layered hairstyles.

lonedesi

11-16 05:28 PM

I sent in my I-140,I-485,EAD & AP applications to Nebraska Service Center which was the nodal agency to receive all I-140 applications during July -August 2007. They then would transfer some of the cases to TSC for processing. Due the visa bulletin fiasco, my applications were transferred to VSC for data entry and all my receipts have an EAC number. I received my EAD & AP and also a transfer notice informing that my I-485 was transferred to TSC as my job is in a state that comes under TSC's jurisdiction. But I did not hear anything about my I-140 being transferred to TSC. So we called up USCIS to check on it. We were informed that VSC would process my I-140 application and it was not necessary for it to be transferred to TSC unlike I-485.
My concern is VSC is taking for ever to process I-140's and currently are processing Apr 06 applications. I believe the dates have remained like that for a while now. Atleast TSC says clearly that they will process I-140 in 6 months, but VSC has no such processing times mentioned. Due to no fault of mine, my application ended up in VSC and is stuck there until some kind folks pick them for reviewing..which may take more than a year going by the current processing times. Is there anything I could do to have it transferred to TSC? Are there other members in the same situation? There is no likelihood of PPS starting anytime soon....what are my options to fix this problem? I thought under the new bi-specialization procedures only NSC & TSC processed I-140 applications...

---

2010 pictures short hairstyles

Mohawk Hairstyles For Black

GCwaitforever

12-04 05:57 PM

you should in fact thank the system for letting you to continue on H1 ..

That is somewhat slavish mentality. For a different perspective ... In the words of Curt Flood, "A well-paid slave is nonetheless a slave".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001366.html

---

more...

very short hairstyles for

rongha_2000

10-02 11:42 AM

Gotcha..!! Thanks..

No I dont plan to invoke AC21 anytime soon.

Your assumptions are exactly right. Do you plan to invoke AC21 in near future? I think if you switch to a company who is willing to transfer your H1B, you can transfer it as well. This is what my attorney told me some time back when I was in your stage and can still avoid using EAD.

The purpose of maintaining the backup is for safety. Even if your 485 denied, you can still have some time period left on your H1 and can look for other alternative avenues to be here legally and can restart your GC process as well. Without this H1 backup, you have a very little time to do so.

(Though I got GC now, my H1 is valid till end of 2010 :) )

---

hair New Short Hairstyles For Girls

Japanese Short Haircuts for

meridiani.planum

04-21 05:09 PM

Hi,

I am working in US on L1 and my company would start my green card filling in next few months.

I also have valid H1B pettion stamped and can switch to H1B which would mean that I can work freely here at US.

But many of my friends told me that green card processing is faster on L1.

I am not able to make decision whether I should continue working on L1 or change my status to H1 to get better hike and more opportunity.

Pls can anyone tell me which would be wise choice. Is green card processing for L1 visa is faster?

Thanks in advance.

~Greeta

GC in L1 is not faster than H1. Its just that L1-As are typically multinational managers who qualify for EB1, and H1s typically are engineers/worker-bees who qualify for the longer EB2/EB3 Process. So first find out what your category is going to be, EB1 or one of the other two.
If you qualify for EB1, your GC process will be fast (~6 months), if its EB2 or EB3, hunker down for a long (5?10 years?) wait. This is irrespective of whether you are in L1 Or H1.

advantages of H1
- can be extended indefinately past 6 years in 1-3 year increments; once you have a GC going (LC >365 days old or I-140 approved).
- can change employers in the US.

advantages of L1
- if your spouse is on L2, he/she can get an EAD and work.

so main issues with your current status of L1:
- If you have not filed your 485 within your L1 time, you need to change status to something else or return to home country. You cant get the extensions that you can get with H1.
- if you lose your job, if you already had an H1 In the past you can move to that status, otherwise you need to go to home country and then get lucky in next years lottery.
- there are no salary restrictions, so the employer can potentially legally underpay you. With H1 you must atleast be paid the prevailing wage.

So unless you have a spouse that is currently on an L2-EAD, I would think moving to H1 makes more sense. (time in L1 counts agianst your time for H1 and vice-versa)

---

more...

Short Hairstyle For Girls.

ash27

04-03 02:02 PM

It is still not very clear if working with companies like TekSystems on EAD is fine using AC-21.

This question has been asked before. However, I have not seen any specific answers regarding this. Any information will be appreciated.

Thanks

---

hot short haircuts Girls. 3N16MA

short Haircuts+for+girls+

theperm

05-07 07:51 PM

The Employer won`t be touching the I-140 or any other related GC apps.About the time frame for getting same or similar job...I am seriously keeping my fingers crossed!!!!
Thanks for all the detailed inputs alterego !!!

---

more...

house short hairstyles for girls

short emo hairstyles for girls

newbie2020

05-18 08:01 PM

We should note that this bill was introduced in mid march and we didn't have any clue (including IV) sometimes chances of such bills may be easier to pass if the bill author chooses to include the provisions into another bill. Sometimes it better to stay low and get the provisions passed..;) ..... Overall i feel the provisions of this bill may get included into another one like 6039 or so

Contacting the authors and seeking their support will surely benefit us,

What do u guys think?

---

tattoo Textured Short Hairstyles

cute short haircuts for girls, this short hairstyle is so cute

mishras

05-14 10:49 AM

This is not a joke, we have received this querry, and are seeking some helpful advice.

---

more...

pictures emo layered hairstyles.

short hairstyles girls. Short Hairstyles for Girls

sabr

09-19 05:39 PM

meaning I can work for company B now and even though my h1b renewal approves with company A? then when I feel like I can go out and reenter before the h1b renewal period ends?

---

dresses short Haircuts+for+girls+

Cute Razor Hairstyle for Girls Cute Razor Hairstyle for Girls Short Black

Krilnon

03-04 07:28 PM

It hasn't even been 23 hours yet, calm down! :P

---

more...

makeup very short hairstyles for

short hairstyles for girls

wandmaker

04-04 01:34 PM

I work as a software engineer in India and the US branch of my company has filed a L1-B petition by September 2008. The petition got denied by Nov 18, 2008 stating that I don't possess "specialized knowledge". Knowing that I am the only person who possesses knowledge of one of the company's product, we filed an appeal to re-consider by Dec 18, 2008.

The USCIS moved the case to AAO by Feb 9, 2009. After which there is no status change. The status of the case as reported by the USCIS web site is:

Application Type: I290B, NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COMMISSIONER

Current Status: Appeal/Motion/Certification sent to Administrative Appeals Office for review.


Two months have passed by and I don't know how much more time it is going to take. Can someone please tell me how long this process is going to take?

Should we just withdraw this appeal and re-file again? In the meantime can I opt a B1 and work there a few months until the L1-B is approved?

If your resume portraits a product customization or support then in the USCIS eyes, you do not posses specialized skills.... Additionally, The initial evidence (including resume) that your company has submitted is not sufficient enough to prove that you posses that specialized skills. Your company also has a base in the US so the availability of US worker in the same skill is very much possible with in the company - Hence, USCIS denied your L1. IMHO, your appeal may not be fruitful....

---

girlfriend cute short haircuts for girls, this short hairstyle is so cute

short hairstyles girls. Asian Hairstyles For Girls

jgh_res

05-17 10:01 AM

Here is the link:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/17/dobbs.bushspeech/index.html


Posted article is below. Refer to the highlighted section :

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush's address from the Oval Office on border security and illegal immigration failed to satisfy either advocates of amnesty or those demanding that the government secure our borders and ports. Whether by design or not, however, the president did manage to advance public awareness of both crises.

The president finally acknowledged the unsustainable social and economic burdens of permitting millions of illegal aliens to forge documents, pressure our public schools and hospitals, and overtax our local and state budgets.

And the president, in asking for more border patrol officers and sending 6,000 National Guardsmen to our southern border to support the Border Patrol, also acknowledged the federal government's utter failure to protect the American people by securing our borders, across which as many as three million illegal aliens enter this country each year.

President Bush's five-point plan began with the words, "First, the United States must secure its borders." But the president did not assign any urgency to the national task of doing so. Deploying as many as 6,000 members of the National Guard to help secure our broken border with Mexico is positive step.

But the president's proposal to place those National Guardsmen in some sort of adjunct support role is peculiar at best, and without question, woefully inadequate. The president sounded as if he were trying to appease Mexico's President Vicente Fox, assuring him we would not militarize the border. If there is to be appeasement at all, that should fall to the Mexican government rather than President Bush.

Not only are millions of illegal aliens entering the United States each year across that border, but so are illegal drugs. More cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and marijuana flood across the Mexican than from any other place, more than three decades into the war on drugs.

President Bush and all the open borders advocates should be held to account for not doing everything in their power to destroy the drug traffic across our borders, as well as illegal immigration.

If it is necessary to send 20,000 -- 30,000 National Guard troops to the border with Mexico to preserve our national sovereignty and protect the American people from rampant drug trafficking, illegal immigration and the threat of terrorists, than I cannot imagine why this president and this Congress would hesitate to do so.

And how can this president and this Congress begin to rationalize placing immigration reform, which has been neglected since the last amnesty 20 years ago, ahead of national security and the safety of all Americans?

President Bush went on to say that in order to secure our borders we must create a temporary guest worker program. What? Come again, Mr. President. The president knows better, and so do the American people. Control of our borders and ports is necessary to our national security and a temporary worker program is an exploitive luxury for corporate America.

The president also said we need to hold employers who hire illegal aliens accountable, but he failed to say how. What should be the penalties for these illegal employers? How large a fine should they receive? How many years in jail for the executives of such companies?

It would have been inspiring to hear the president say that he and his friend Vicente Fox had discussed illegal immigration and drug trafficking and reached an agreement that both our country's militaries would be used to create a joint border security force, one that working together would ensure the integrity of the Untied States/Mexico border.

Wouldn't it have been nice as well for this president to suggest that the U.S. government would also take seriously its responsibilities to create a new and efficient immigration system to accommodate the backlog of millions of people trying to do the right thing? The same agency that would have to oversee Mr. Bush's amnesty program could not begin to do so because the Citizenship and Immigration Services already faces a backlog of millions of people who are trying to enter this country lawfully.

Aside from the fact that both political parties are complicit with corporate America and special interests in placing so-called immigration reform ahead of border and port security speaks volumes about our elected officials' commitment to the national interest and the weight and influence of corporate America over both parties.

Mr. President, I don't think the American people will tolerate this much longer.

---

hairstyles Short Hairstyle For Girls.

hot Short Hair Styles for Girls short haircuts 2011 for girls. girls short

chanduv23

07-11 02:42 PM

My EAD and AP application was received June 19, 2009 at TSC. To my pleasant shocking & surprise USCIS approved mine and wife's application in 20 days and we received the card today.

We are happy with the speed and efficiency USCIS and wish they could do everything the same way. we received two year EAD but concerned as receiving a two year EAD indicates that it may take a while to get my PD (Dec 2005).

Thanks
Senthil.

My EAD and AP were receipted on June 9th from TSC. AP got approved, EAD still pending. So I guess these approvals are random.

---

lecter

March 15th, 2004, 05:18 PM

Steven brings up a good point about those camera phones. I fear them to a degree. Someone told me recently that they had read/heard advice that when you're using a credit card at a store make sure you keep the numbers covered up. Apparently, people with camera phones have been known to take a picture of your card to get the numbers and expiration date.
Gary


gee they'd want to be close.

---

vicks_don

04-18 03:04 PM

thanks felix 31.

I filed it last year oct in VSC. got an rfe last month. i haven't received any case transfer notice. I am planning to answer rfe to VSC. My recepit number starts with EAC.

just one question.
when you said it was filed with NSC and now transfered to TSC. apart from the recipt from NSC that your case is transfered what else could tell us that the case is transfered..like

a) does the receipt number change
b) when we input the previous number in uscis.gov does it say that your case has been transfered.

Thanks for your reply.

---